The Effectiveness of Virtual Leadership Requirements in Saudi Universities Considering the Indicators of the National Center for E-Learning
الكلمات المفتاحية:
virtual leadership, Saudi universities, National Center for E-Learning
الملخص
The study sought to determine the effectiveness of virtual leadership requirements in Saudi universities in light of the indicators of the National Center for E-Learning. The questionnaire was adopted in this research and was given to a sample of 33 faculty members at the University of Hail. The study used a descriptive analytical technique. The research came to the conclusion that the mathematical mean of the three study dimensions—ideal influence, inspirational motivation, and empowerment—had a high level of effectiveness and within a range of 68% to 84%.The results also showed the absence of obstacles, as the arithmetic mean of the field of obstacles was (2.42), which is in a weak degree. Through the results, it was found in the study procedures that there is an effectiveness of the requirements of virtual leadership at the University of Hail in the light of the indicators of the National Center for E-Learning.
المراجع
1. Allaq, B. (2019). Administrative Leadership, Jordan: Dar Al Yazouri Scientific for Publishing and Distribution.
2. Bauer, G. R., Churchill, S. M., Mahendran, M., Walwyn, C., Lizotte, D., & Villa-Rueda, A. A. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: a systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM-population health, 14, 100798.
3. Bell, B. S., McAlpine, K. L., & Hill, N. S. (2019). Leading from a distance: Advancements in virtual leadership research.
4. Bonsu, S., & Twum-Danso, E. (2018). Leadership style in the global economy: A focus on cross-cultural and transformational leadership. Journal of Marketing and Management, 9(2), 37-52.
5. Brankovic, J., Ringel, L., & Werron, T. (2018). How rankings produce competition: The case of global university rankings. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 47(4), 270-288.
6. Cunha, M. N., Chuchu, T., & Maziriri, E. (2020). Threats, challenges, and opportunities for open universities and massive online open courses in the digital revolution. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(12), 191-204.
7. Dincer, H., & Yuksel, S. (2019). Multidimensional evaluation of global investments on the renewable energy with the integrated fuzzy decision‐making model under the hesitancy. International Journal of Energy Research, 43(5), 1775-1784.
8. Institute of Public Administration. (2019). Administrative Development Conference in the Light of the Kingdom’s Vision 2030, retrieved from the website: https://2u.pw/V3FKxw
9. Loucks, S., & Ozogul, G. (2020). Preparing business students for a distributed workforce and global business environment: Gaining virtual leadership skills in an authentic context. TechTrends, 64(4), 655-665.
10. Marshall, J., Roache, D., & Moody, R. (2020). Crisis leadership: A critical examination of educational leadership in higher education in the midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management), 48(3), 30-37.
11. McCaffery, P. (2018). The higher education manager’s handbook: Effective leadership and management in universities and colleges. Routledge.
12. Ministry of Education. (2020). Taibah University, retrieved from the website: https://2u.pw/jSzWm.
13. Mohebi, L. (2019). Educational Leadership and Digital Culture. Available at SSRN 3419519.
14. National Center for E-Learning. (2021). The National E-Learning Indicator, retrieved on 1/1/2022 AH from the online source https://2u.pw/rVS4ee
15. Newman, S. A., Ford, R. C., & Marshall, G. W. (2020). Virtual team leader communication: Employee perception and organizational reality. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(4), 452-473.
16. Roni, S. M., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2021). Data analysis with SPSS for survey-based research. Singapore: Springer.
17. Schwab, K. (2018). The global competitiveness report 2018. World Economic Forum.
18. Transformation Program 2020. (2016). Digital transformation, the Kingdom ranks second in the world in cybersecurity, retrieved from the source from the Internet: https://2u.pw/bywYz.
2. Bauer, G. R., Churchill, S. M., Mahendran, M., Walwyn, C., Lizotte, D., & Villa-Rueda, A. A. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: a systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM-population health, 14, 100798.
3. Bell, B. S., McAlpine, K. L., & Hill, N. S. (2019). Leading from a distance: Advancements in virtual leadership research.
4. Bonsu, S., & Twum-Danso, E. (2018). Leadership style in the global economy: A focus on cross-cultural and transformational leadership. Journal of Marketing and Management, 9(2), 37-52.
5. Brankovic, J., Ringel, L., & Werron, T. (2018). How rankings produce competition: The case of global university rankings. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 47(4), 270-288.
6. Cunha, M. N., Chuchu, T., & Maziriri, E. (2020). Threats, challenges, and opportunities for open universities and massive online open courses in the digital revolution. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(12), 191-204.
7. Dincer, H., & Yuksel, S. (2019). Multidimensional evaluation of global investments on the renewable energy with the integrated fuzzy decision‐making model under the hesitancy. International Journal of Energy Research, 43(5), 1775-1784.
8. Institute of Public Administration. (2019). Administrative Development Conference in the Light of the Kingdom’s Vision 2030, retrieved from the website: https://2u.pw/V3FKxw
9. Loucks, S., & Ozogul, G. (2020). Preparing business students for a distributed workforce and global business environment: Gaining virtual leadership skills in an authentic context. TechTrends, 64(4), 655-665.
10. Marshall, J., Roache, D., & Moody, R. (2020). Crisis leadership: A critical examination of educational leadership in higher education in the midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management), 48(3), 30-37.
11. McCaffery, P. (2018). The higher education manager’s handbook: Effective leadership and management in universities and colleges. Routledge.
12. Ministry of Education. (2020). Taibah University, retrieved from the website: https://2u.pw/jSzWm.
13. Mohebi, L. (2019). Educational Leadership and Digital Culture. Available at SSRN 3419519.
14. National Center for E-Learning. (2021). The National E-Learning Indicator, retrieved on 1/1/2022 AH from the online source https://2u.pw/rVS4ee
15. Newman, S. A., Ford, R. C., & Marshall, G. W. (2020). Virtual team leader communication: Employee perception and organizational reality. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(4), 452-473.
16. Roni, S. M., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2021). Data analysis with SPSS for survey-based research. Singapore: Springer.
17. Schwab, K. (2018). The global competitiveness report 2018. World Economic Forum.
18. Transformation Program 2020. (2016). Digital transformation, the Kingdom ranks second in the world in cybersecurity, retrieved from the source from the Internet: https://2u.pw/bywYz.
منشور
2022-12-25
كيفية الاقتباس
Dr. Sylvia Ismail Mohammad Bani Hani. (2022). The Effectiveness of Virtual Leadership Requirements in Saudi Universities Considering the Indicators of the National Center for E-Learning. Journal of Educational and Human Sciences, (18), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.33193/JEAHS.18.2022.306
إصدار
القسم
المقالات
