دعم جودة الحياة التعليمية لدى طلاب المرحلة الثانوية من خلال تقنيات الواقع المعزز التحفيزي
الملخص
هدف البحث إلى تقصي أثر توظيف تقنيات الواقع المعزز التحفيزي على دعم جودة الحياة التعليمية لدى طلاب المرحلة الثانوية، من خلال تصميم بيئة تعليمية قائمة على الواقع المعزز التحفيزي وتحليل أثرها على جودة الحياة التعليمية. اعتمدت البحث المنهج التجريبي باستخدام تصميم ثلاثي المجموعات، شملت: المجموعة الأولى (الواقع المعزز التحفيزي)، والمجموعة الثانية (الواقع المعزز فقط)، والمجموعة الثالثة (الصفوف الدراسية الاعتيادية – ضابطة). طُبّقت التجربة على (90) طالبًا من الصف الثاني الثانوي بمدرسة أم القرى الثانوية بمحافظة جدة، خلال الفصل الدراسي الثالث للعام الدراسي 1446هـ، وركزت على وحدة "الوراثة المعقدة والوراثة البشرية" من مقرر الأحياء (3-2).،وقد أظهرت نتائج تحليل التباين أحادي الاتجاه (ANOVA) وجود فروق ذات دلالة إحصائية بين المجموعات في درجات جودة الحياة التعليمية (F = 6152.77)، (p = 0.000) وكشفت المقارنات الزوجية باختبار شيفيه أن المجموعة الأولى تفوقت على الثانية بفارق 30.36 درجة، وعلى الثالثة بفارق )62.06 (درجة، بينما تفوقت الثانية على الثالثة بمقدار ) 34.73 (درجة. وتشير النتائج إلى أن الواقع المعزز التحفيزي يعزز الاستقلالية، والتطور الشخصي، والعلاقات الاجتماعية، والإحساس بالمعنى في التعلم، محققًا أثرًا أكبر من الواقع المعزز وحده أو الطريقة التقليدية. وتوصي البحث بتعميم استخدام الواقع المعزز التحفيزي في وحدات دراسية مختلفة، إلى جانب تضمينه في المناهج، وتدريب المعلمين على أدوات التحفيز الرقمي، وإجراء دراسات مستقبلية على مراحل تعليمية ومجالات معرفية متنوعة لتعظيم أثر هذه التقنية.
المراجع
2. الحافظي، فهد. (2020). نموذج مقترح لتوظيف تكنولوجيا الواقع المعزز في مقررات السنة التحضيرية وفاعليته في تنمية مهارات التعلم المنظم ذاتيًا لدى طلاب جامعة الملك عبد العزيز. مجلة جامعة الملك عبد العزيز، كلية الآداب والعلوم الإنسانية، 28(12)، 252-289.
3. العمري، عائشة، والعوهلي، دلال. (2023). درجة توظيف روبوت الدردشة الافتراضي Chatbot لتحسين جودة التعليم وتنمية مهارات التفكير الإبداعي من وجهة نظر متخصصي تكنولوجيا التعليم. المجلة الدولية لتكنولوجيا التعليم والمعلومات، 1(3)، 33-49.
4. العنزي، نايف. (2024). فاعلية تقنية الواقع المعزز في تنمية مهارات تصميم الاختبارات الإلكترونية لدى معلمي التعليم. مجلة الفنون والأدب وعلوم الإنسانيات والاجتماع، (105)، 471-488.
5. Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M.-D., Luque-de la Rosa, A., & Morales Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Sustainability of educational technologies: An approach to augmented reality research. Sustainability, 12(10). https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4091
6. AL- Halfawi, W., & Zaki, M. (2015). Educational Technology from Traditional to Digital, Jeddah. King Abdulaziz University Press, Scientific Publishing Center.
7. Al-Hafdi, F. S. (2023). Distance learning gains via digital platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study of the experience of faculty members. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences, 15(1)
8. Al-Hafdi, F. S. (2025). The effectiveness of a sustainable environment based on augmented reality in developing media literacy skills for secondary school students. Ajman Journal of Studies & Research, 24(1).
9. Al-Hafdi, F. S., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2024). Ten years of gamification-based learning: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(7), 188–210.https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i07.45335
10. Al-Hafdi, F. S., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2024). Ten years of gamification-based learning: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(7), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i07.45335
11. Al-Hafdi, F. S., & AlNajdi, S. M. (2024). The effectiveness of using chatbot-based environment on learning process, students’ performances and perceptions: A mixed exploratory study. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 20633–20664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13024-1
12. Al-Hafdi, F.S., AlNajdi, S.M. The effectiveness of using chatbot-based environment on learning process, students’ performances and perceptions: A mixed exploratory study. Educ Inf Technol 29, 20633–20664 (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12671-6
13. Alhalafawy, W. S., & Zaki, M. Z. (2024). The impact of augmented reality technology on the psychological resilience of secondary school students during educational crises. Ajman Journal of Studies & Research, 23(1).
14. Alharbi, T. S., Al-Hafdi, F. S., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2025). Exploring the framework for intelligent operations (FiOps) for teachers in the era of generative AI (GenAI). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(8).
15. Alnimran, F. M., & alhalafawy, w. s. (2024). Qualitative Exploration of the Opportunities and Challenges of Online Training According to the Behavioral Intention Variables of the Most Trained Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8), 4837. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.4837
16. Alrashedi, N. T., Alsulami, S. M. H., Flatah, A. I., Najmi, A. H., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2024). The Effects of Gamified Platforms on Enhancing Learners’ Ambition. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 3393-3304. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5004
17. Alrashedi, N. T., Najmi, A. H., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2024). Utilising Gamification to Enhance Ambition on Digital Platforms: An Examination of Faculty Members Perspectives in Times of Crisis. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 3404-3416. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5003
18. Alsayed, W. O., Al-Hafdi, F. S., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2024). Non-stop educational support: Exploring the opportunities and challenges of intelligent chatbots use to support learners from the viewpoint of practitioner educators. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 229–212.
19. Alsayed, W. O., Al-Hafdi, F. S., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2025). Chatbots in education. In Empowering STEM Educators With Digital Tools (pp. 137–154). IGI Global.
20. Alzahrani, A., & Al-Hafdi, F. S. (2021). Effectiveness of augmented reality in developing the reflective thinking skills among secondary school students. Multicultural Education, 7(1), 1–10.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5294802
21. Azmy, N. G., Alhalafawy, W. S., & Anwar, R(2015). Virtual Educational Tours. In N. G. Azmy (Ed.), Interactive learning environments (pp. 495-545). Dar Elfikr Elarabi, Cairo. Egypt.
22. Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322
23. Briganti, P., Volpe, T., Veglianti, E., & Varriale, L. (2024). Technology for sustainability in the educational context: A portrait of the Italian universities. ITM Web of Conferences, 62, 04002. EDP Sciences.
24. Bruinsma, J., & Crutzen, R. (2018). A longitudinal study on the stability of the need for cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.001
25. Carmen, M., & Clara, F. (2021). Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Educational Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
26. Chang, H.-Y., Yu, Y.-T., Wu, H.-K., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2016). The impact of a mobile augmented reality game: Changing students' perceptions of the complexity of socioscientific reasoning. 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Austin, TX, USA.
27. Diwan, C., Srinivasa, S., Suri, G., Agarwal, S., & Ram, P. (2023). AI-based learning content generation and learning pathway augmentation to increase learner engagement. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100110.
28. Estapa, A., & Nadolny, L. (2015). The effect of an augmented reality-enhanced mathematics lesson on student achievement and motivation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 40.
29. Ferro, L. S. (2021). The game element and mechanic (GEM) framework: A structural approach for implementing game elements and mechanics into game experiences. Entertainment Computing, 36, 100375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100375
30. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2019). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 1–27.
31. Gray, J. S., Ozer, D. J., & Rosenthal, R. (2017). Goal conflict and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.003
32. Halliday, S. E., Calkins, S. D., & Leerkes, E. M. (2018). Measuring preschool learning engagement in the laboratory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.002
33. Hlayel, M., & Jawad, M. S. (2023). Leverage digital transformation in distance learning for maximum students’ engagement by utilization of the integrated technologies of digital twin, extended realities, and gamification. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 7, 1594–1620.
34. Hoadley, C., & Campos, F. C. (2022). Design-based research: What it is and why it matters to studying online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2079128
35. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review.
36. Hwang, Y. S., & Chang, Y. S. (2018). Exploring the relationship between quality of life and academic achievement in high school students. Educational Studies, 44(4), 363–379.
37. Ibrahim, H. O., Al-Hafdi, F. S., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2024). Ethnographic insights of educational digital life behaviours: A study of affluent schools. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 4413–4428.
38. Intawong, K., & Puritat, K. (2021). A framework of developing mobile gamification to improve user engagement of physical activity: A case study of location-based augmented reality mobile game for promoting physical health. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 17(7), 100-122. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v17i07.22349
39. Joo-Nagata, J., Martinez Abad, F., García-Bermejo Giner, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Augmented reality and pedestrian navigation through its implementation in m-learning and e-learning: Evaluation of an educational program in Chile. Computers & Education, 111, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.003
40. Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29.
41. Kleftodimos, A., Moustaka, M., & Evagelou, A. (2023). Location-based augmented reality for cultural heritage education: Creating educational, gamified location-based AR applications for the prehistoric lake settlement of Dispilio. Digital, 3(1), 18-45. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6470/3/1/2
42. Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013
43. Koumpouros, Y. (2024). Revealing the true potential and prospects of augmented reality in education. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00288-0
44. Lameras, P., Arnab, S., Dunwell, I., Stewart, C., Clarke, S., & Petridis, P. (2017). Essential features of serious games design in higher education: Linking learning attributes to game mechanics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 972–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12467
45. Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2023). Integrating augmented reality, gamification, and serious games in computer science education. Education Sciences, 13(6), 618.
46. LaRosa, N., & Dinsmore, D. (2020). Student physical therapists’ perceptions of clinical reasoning: A systematic review of the literature. Health Professions Education, 6(4), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2020.06.002
47. Laurens-Arredondo, L. (2022). Mobile augmented reality adapted to the ARCS model of motivation: A case study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 1–20.
48. Leclercq, T., Poncin, I., & Hammedi, W. (2020). Opening the black box of gameful experience: Implications for gamification process design. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.07.007
49. Lee, J., Song, H., & Hong, A. (2019). Exploring factors and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability, 11(4), 985–996. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985
50. López-Belmonte, J., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., López-Núñez, J.-A., & Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J. (2023). Augmented reality in education: A scientific mapping in Web of Science. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 1860-1874.
51. López-Bouzas, N., & Pérez, M. E. D. M. (2023). A gamified environment supported by augmented reality for improving communicative competencies in students with ASD: Design and validation. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 19, 80-93.
52. Manwaring, K. C., Larsen, R., Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Halverson, L. R. (2017). Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.002
53. Moffett, J., Cassidy, D., Collins, N., Illing, J., De Carvalho Filho, M. A., & Bok, H. (2023). Exploring medical students’ learning around uncertainty management using a digital educational escape room: A design-based research approach. Perspectives on Medical Education, 12(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.844
54. Najmi, A. H., Alameer, Y. R., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2024). Exploring the Enablers of IoT in Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Expert Tweets. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(10), 5079. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.5079
55. oumpouros, Y. (2024). Revealing the true potential and prospects of augmented reality in education. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00288-0
56. Perry, M., & Leong, P. (2021). Design-based research: A new approach to educational research. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(2), 45–60.
57. Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. In Educational Design Research, 11-50.
58. Porto, D. d. P., Jesus, G. M. d., Ferrari, F. C., & Fabbri, S. C. P. F. (2021). Initiatives and challenges of using gamification in software engineering: A systematic mapping. Journal of Systems and Software, 173, 110870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110870
59. Putz, L.-M., Hofbauer, F., & Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Can gamification help to improve education? Findings from a longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106392
60. Ramírez-Verdugo, M. D., & López, M. (2022). Gamification and augmented reality to upgrade elementary bilingual education students' health and engagement: An innovation and research proposal for teacher education. In Research Anthology on Bilingual and Multilingual Education (pp. 746–768). IGI Global.
61. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. (2022). Agency as a foundation for student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 78–90.
62. Ruiz-Ariza, A., Casuso, R. A., Suarez-Manzano, S., & Martínez-López, E. J. (2018). Effect of augmented reality game Pokémon GO on cognitive performance and emotional intelligence in adolescents. Computers & Education, 116, 49-63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.002.
63. Sanchez, D. R., Langer, M., & Kaur, R. (2020). Gamification in the classroom: Examining the impact of gamified quizzes on student learning. Computers & Education, 144, 103666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103666
64. Santos, Johnson, C., Hill, L., Lock, J., Altowairiki, N., Ostrowski, C., & Liu, Y. (2017). Using design-based research to develop meaningful online discussions in undergraduate field experience courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6).
65. Santos, M. E. C., Chen, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Miyazaki, J., & Kato, H. (2014). Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(1), 38-56.
66. Santos, M. E. C., Chen, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Miyazaki, J., & Kato, H. (2014). Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(1), 38-56.
67. Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2020). Design-based research: A methodology to extend and enrich biology education research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2), es11.
68. Setiawan, B., Rachmadtullah, R., Farid, D. A. M., Sugandi, E., & Iasha, V. (2023). Augmented reality as learning media: The effect on elementary school students' science process ability in terms of cognitive style. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 23(10).
69. Setiawan, B., Rachmadtullah, R., Farid, D. A. M., Sugandi, E., & Iasha, V. (2023). Augmented reality as learning media: The effect on elementary school students' science process ability in terms of cognitive style. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 23(10).
70. Setiawan, B., Rachmadtullah, R., Farid, D. A. M., Sugandi, E., & Iasha, V. (2023). Augmented reality as learning media: The effect on elementary school students' science process ability in terms of cognitive style. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 23(10).
71. Shakroum, M., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2018). The influence of gesture-based learning system (GBLS) on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 117, 75-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.002
72. Taylor, R., Thomas-Gregory, A., & Hofmeyer, A. (2020). Teaching empathy and resilience to undergraduate nursing students: A call to action in the context of COVID-19. Nurse Education Today, 94, 104524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104524
73. Tsai, C.-H., & Huang, J.-Y. (2018). Augmented reality display based on user behavior. Computer Standards. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.08.003
74. Wahyuanto, E., Heriyanto, H., & Hastuti, S. (2024). Study of the use of augmented reality technology in improving the learning experience in the classroom. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 2(05), 700–705.
75. Wahyuanto, E., Heriyanto, H., & Hastuti, S. (2024). Study of the use of augmented reality technology in improving the learning experience in the classroom. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 2(05), 700–705.
76. Wang, L., & Chen, C. (2024). Factors affecting student academic performance: A systematic review. International Journal on Studies in Education, 7, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.276
77. Wangzhou, K., Hao, C., & Wang, H. (2023). Construction of evaluation model of ecotourism resources in featured small towns. Kybernetes, 52(2), 554-565.
78. Weng, C., Tran, K. N. P., Yang, C.-C., Huang, H.-I., & Chen, H. (2023). Can an augmented reality-integrated gamification approach enhance vocational high school students' learning outcomes and motivation in an electronics course? Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11966-4
79. You, F., He, H., & Cui, W. (2022). A review of sustainable urban regeneration approaches based on augmented reality technology: A case of the Bund in Shanghai. Sustainability, 14(19), 12869.
80. Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H., & Chu, S. K. W. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145, 103729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729
81. Zaki, M. Z. T., El-Refai, W. Y., Alharthi, M. A., Al-Hafdi, F. S., Najmi, A. H., ... (2024). The effect of mobile search retrieval types on self-regulated learning among middle school students. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 3382–3392.
82. Zaki, M., El-Refai, W., Najmi, A., Al-Hafdi, F. S., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2024). The effect of educational activities through the flipped classroom on students with low metacognitive thinking. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(4), 2476–2491.
83. Zhang, J., Li, G., Huang, Q., Feng, Q., & Luo, H. (2022). Augmented reality in K–12 education: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 2000 to 2020. Sustainability, 14(15), 9725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159725 Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2020). Design-based research: A methodology to extend and enrich biology education research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2),
84. Zohdi, A. M., Al-Hafdi, F. S., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2024). The role of digital platforms in studying the Holy Qur’an: A case study based on the voices of students from diverse cultures at the Prophet’s Mosque. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 3050–3062.
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2025 عبدالعزيز عبدالله الزهراني , د. فهد بن سليم الحافظي , د. أحمد بن إبراهيم فلاته

هذا العمل مرخص حسب الرخصة Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
