العوامل المؤثرة على تنمية مواهب الفنانين مزدوجي الاستثنائية النخبة في المملكة العربية السعودية
الكلمات المفتاحية:
تطوير المواهب، الأفراد مزدوجي الاستثنائية، نموذج نظرية التطور المعقد، الفنون البصرية
الملخص
تهدف الدراسة الحالية إلى تحديد العوامل المؤثرة على بناء وتنمية المواهب الفنية لدى الفنانين من ذوي الإعاقة (مزدوجي الاستثنائية) وتفسير كيفية عملها كمحفزات لتنمية المواهب لدى الفنانين النخبة من مزدوجي الاستثنائية، ولتحقيق ذلك تم استخدام منهجية علم الظواهر التفسيرية (Interpretive Phenomenology)، وتم جمع البيانات باستخدام ثلاث أدوات: تحليل ملفات الإنجاز للفنانين النخبة من ذوي الإعاقات الحركية واضطراب طيف التوحد والمقابلات المعمقة ومجموعة التركيز الذين حققوا إنجازات فنية وشاركوا في معارض وفعاليات فنية محلية أو إقليمية، حيث بلغ إجمالي العينة المشاركة (17) مشارك ومشاركة من مزدوجي الاستثنائية، (10 ذكور/ 7 إناث) تراوحت أعمارهم ما بين 19- 54 عاماً، وبعد إجراء معالجة وتحليل البيانات وفق الافتراضات التي يقوم عليها نموذج نظرية التعقيد المتطور Evolving Complexity Theory Model (ETC)، توصل الباحثان إلى وجود (10) عوامل رئيسية تدعم تطوير المواهب الفنية للفنانين النخبة للوصول إلى مرحلة التميز الاستثنائي في الفنون البصرية، وتم تصنيف هذه العوامل إلى (4) عوامل داخلية، و(6) عوامل بيئية وفق افتراضات النظرية، ثم ناقش الباحثان الكيفية التي تعمل بها هذه العوامل ومدى مناسبتها وتوافقها مع مؤشرات نجاح التدخلات الخاصة بالفنانين من مزدوجي الاستثنائية تمهيداً لتحقيق النجاح والتميز في ضوء التجارب الحقيقية للفنانين النخبة داخل بيئة المملكة العربية السعودية.
المراجع
1. الجغيمان، عبد الله محمد. (2021). مزدوجو الاستثنائية " مواهب مخفية"، الموسوعة الشاملة في الإعاقة، مكتبة جرير.
2. وزارة الثقافة. (2020). تقرير الحالة الثقافية 2020 رقمنة الثقافة، الإدارة العامة للأبحاث والدراسات الثقافية، https://www.moc.gov.sa/Modules/Pages/Publications/Status-Culture-Report
3. Akhmedova, E., Pozdnyakova, I., Misherina, I., Kolosova, N., Pashina, S., & Uvarova, N. (2019, December). Art pedagogical space as an innovative environment for creative development of a child. In International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019) (pp. 254-259). Atlantis Press.
4. Akkaya, G. & Ertekin, P. (2021). A Visual Examination of Literature for Twice-exceptional Individuals: A Bibliometric Study. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (52), 492-517. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.706012.
5. Aladsani, M. (2020). Investigating Teachers’ Perspectives of Gifted Students with Specific Learning Disabilities in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University).
6. Alhumaid, M. M., Brooke, M., & Khoo, S. (2022). Insider Perspectives on Saudi Arabia’s Fakher Disability Sports Programme. Sustainability, 14(17), 10706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710706.
7. Alsamiri, Y. (2019). Twice-exceptional students in Saudi Arabia: A review of the research literature from 1990 to 2018. International Journal of Learning Management Systems, 7(2), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijlms.2019.200140.
8. Alsharif, N., & Alasiri, H. (2022). Teachers’ Perspectives on Obstacles Facing Gifted Students with Learning Disabilities in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(4), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.4.32.
9. Alyami, A. (2009). The integration of art therapy into physical rehabilitation in a Saudi hospital. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 36(5), 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2009.07.001.
10. Arnstein, K.B. (2022). The Intersectionality of Twice-Exceptionality: Historic, Current, and Future Perspectives. In: F. H. Piske, K. H. Collins & K.B. Arnstein (Eds.), Critical Issues in Servicing Twice Exceptional Students. (pp. 3-18). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10378-0_1
11. Azmat, F., Rentschler, R., Lee, B., & Fujimoto, Y. (2023). Understanding social responsibility and relational pressures in nonprofit organisations. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267231183852.
12. Baghestani, A. R., Ahmadi, F., Tanha, A., & Meshkat, M. (2019). Bayesian critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 52(1), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1308227.
13. Barnes, C. (2019). Understanding the social model of disability: Past, present and future. In: N. Watson, A. Roulstone & C. Thomas, Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 14-31). Routledge.
14. Beckmann, E., & Minnaert, A. (2018). Non-cognitive characteristics of gifted students with learning disabilities: An in-depth systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00504.
15. Billups, F. D. (2021). Qualitative data collection tools: Design, development, and applications (pp. 36-87). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878699.
16. Cain, M. K., Kaboski, J. R., & Gilger, J. W. (2019). Profiles and academic trajectories of cognitively gifted children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 23(7), 1663-1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318804019.
17. Carroll, L.S.L. (2018). Practical Interventions to Improve Domain-Specific Social, Emotional, or Academic Outcomes for Twice-Exceptional Individuals (2e). Preprints 2018, 2018120282. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201812.0282.v1.
18. Chung, S., & Son, J. W. (2023). How well do we understand autistic savant artists: A review of various hypotheses and research findings to date. Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.230004.
19. Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (2015). "Theory into Practice: Teaching Talented Visual Art Students in Hong Kong". In H. E. Vidergor & C. R. Harris (Eds.), Applied Practice for Educators of Gifted and Able Learners (pp.429-439). The Brill.
20. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed). Sage publications.
21. Dai, D. Y. (2017). Envisioning a New Foundation for Gifted Education: Evolving Complexity Theory (ECT) of Talent Development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701837.
22. Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2013). Three Paradigms of Gifted Education: In Search of Conceptual Clarity in Research and Practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490020.
23. Dai, D. Y., & Li, X. (2020). Behind an accelerated scientific research career: Dynamic interplay of endogenous and exogenous forces in talent development. Education Sciences, 10(9), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090220
24. Darcy, S., Maxwell, H., Grabowski, S., & Onyx, J. (2019). Artistic Impact: From Casual and Serious Leisure to Professional Career Development in Disability Arts. Leisure Sciences, 44(4), 514–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2019.1613461.
25. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In. N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.) 5th ed, The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp.1-26). SAGE Publications.
26. Edwards, B. M., Smart, E., King, G., Curran, C. J., & Kingsnorth, S. (2018). Performance and visual arts-based programs for children with disabilities: a scoping review focusing on psychosocial outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(4), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1503734.
27. Finley, C. (2013). Access to the visual arts: History and Programming for People with Disabilities. Vanderbilt Kennedy Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities.
28. Foley Nicpon, M., Allmon, A., Sieck, B., & Stinson, R. D. (2011). Empirical Investigation of Twice-Exceptionality: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698621038257.
29. Garrels, V., & Sigstad, H. M. H. (2021). Employment for persons with intellectual disability in the Nordic countries: A scoping review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 34(4), 993-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12880.
30. Gibbs, G. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526441867.
31. Gierczyk, M., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (2021). The Impact of School Environment on Talent Development: A Retrospective View of Gifted British and Polish College Students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 567-592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211034909
32. Goddard, J. (2018). Valuing the place of young people with learning disabilities in the arts. In B. Kelly, B. Byrne (Eds.), Valuing Disabled Children and Young People (pp. 170-187). Routledge.
33. Gupta, N., & Zieske, C. (2024). Arts-based phenomenological research: Theory and praxis. Qualitative Psychology, 11(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000285.
34. Gute, R., G., Gute, D.S., Nakamura, J., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The Early Lives of Highly Creative Persons: The Influence of the Complex Family. In: M., Csikszentmihalyi The Systems Model of Creativity: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. (pp. 293-317). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_18.
35. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications.
36. Knotek, S. E., Foley-Nicpon, M., Kozbelt, A., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Portenga, S., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2020). Gatekeeping in high-performance settings. Review of general psychology, 24(3), 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020905578.
37. Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092.
38. Kousha, K., Stuart, E., Abdoli, M., & Thelwall, M. (2024). How do museums and galleries help academics create societal impact? An analysis of the UK REF2021 impact case studies. Scientometrics, 129(12), 7759-7782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05180-3.
39. Kozbelt, A. (2022). The Future of the Fine Arts. In: Henriksen, D., Mishra, P. (eds) Creative Provocations: Speculations on the Future of Creativity, Technology & Learning. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, (pp. 97-111). vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14549-0_7.
40. Kuo, C. (2022). Expanding the Conception of Giftedness to Talent Development. Gifted Education International, 38(3), 438-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211062298
41. Lovett, B. J., & Sparks, R. L. (2013). The Identification and Performance of Gifted Students with Learning Disability Diagnoses: A Quantitative Synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(4), 304-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411421810.
42. Maddocks, D. L. S. (2020). Cognitive and Achievement Characteristics of Students from a National Sample Identified as Potentially Twice Exceptional (Gifted with a Learning Disability). Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219886668.
43. Magon, R., & Cupchik, G. (2023). Examining the Role of Aesthetic Experiences in Self-Realization and Self-Transcendence: A Thematic Analysis. Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 10(1-2), 68-94. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2023-0006.
44. Miller, S. M. (2020). Disability Art: Potential Intersections in Studio Practice with Artists Labeled/With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Art Therapy, 37(2), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2020.1756136.
45. Mohammed, A. A. (2020). The Effects of Disability Labeling on Teachers’ Referrals of Twice-exceptional Children to Gifted Programs in Saudi Arabia. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado].
46. Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091.
47. National Association for Gifted Children. (2014, July). Arts Education and Gifted and Talented Students (Position Statement). Arlington, VA: Author. from https://nagc.org/page/position-statements.
48. National Association for Gifted Children. (2018, August). Use of the WISC-V for gifted and twice exceptional identification (Position Statement). Arlington, VA: Author. from https://nagc.org/page/position-statements.
49. Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of Purposive Sampling Techniques with Their Examples and Application in Qualitative Research Studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(1), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419.
50. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2018). The Role of the Family in Talent Development. In: Pfeiffer, S. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_9
51. Olszewski‐Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., Davis, L. C., & Worrell, F. C. (2019). Benchmarking psychosocial skills important for talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20318.
52. Paik, S.J., Kunisaki, L.T., Tran, V.Q. and Marshall-Harper, K.R. (2023), "Understanding the talent development of notable artists and scientists of color and women: why contextual factors matter", European Journal of Training and Development, 47 (3/4), 301-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2021-0100.
53. Pennings, M. (2015). Art museums and the global tourist: Experience centers in experiencescapes. Athens Journal of Tourism, 2(4), 209-221.
54. Peters, S. J. (2022). The Challenges of Achieving Equity Within Public School Gifted and Talented Programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
55. Piirto, J. (2022). Talent development in the arts: A unique pathway or branches on a common road? In J. VanTassel-Baska. (Ed.), Talent development in gifted education: Theory, research, and practice, (pp. 195-210). Routledge.
56. Reis, S. M., Baum, S. M., & Burke, E. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976.
57. Sanita, J. K. (2019). The Phenomenon of Artistic Talent in the Dyslexic Brain Visual Arts as an Intervention Strategy for Students with Dyslexia. [Master's Thesis, California State University, Long Beach].
58. Seaman, B. A. (2020). Economic impact of the arts. In R. Towse and T. Navarrete Hernández. (Ed.), Handbook of Cultural Economics, Third Edition (pp. 241-253). Edward Elgar Publishing.
59. Stober, K., & García Iriarte, E. (2022). Intellectual disability, art and identity: a qualitative exploration of the experiences of professional artists with intellectual disabilities. Disability & Society, 38(10), 1871–1894. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2045187.
60. Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056.
61. Subotnik, R. F., Stoeger, H., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2017). Talent development research, policy, and practice in Europe and the United States: Outcomes from a summit of international researchers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 262-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701839.
62. Trail, B. A. (2022). Twice-exceptional gifted children: Understanding, teaching, and counseling gifted students. Routledge.
63. Treffert, D. A., & Rebedew, D. L. (2015). The Savant Syndrome Registry: A Preliminary Report. WMJ: official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin, 114(4), 158–162. https://wmjonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/114/4/158.pdf.
64. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2008). The UN Convention on the rights of persons with Disabilities. New York: UN DESA. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.
65. Visual Arts National Coalition for Core Arts Standards. (2014). National Core Arts Standards. Rights Administered by the State Education Agency Directors of Arts Education. Dover.
66. Wilson, H. E. (2018). Integrating the arts and STEM for gifted learners. Roeper review, 40(2), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1434712.
2. وزارة الثقافة. (2020). تقرير الحالة الثقافية 2020 رقمنة الثقافة، الإدارة العامة للأبحاث والدراسات الثقافية، https://www.moc.gov.sa/Modules/Pages/Publications/Status-Culture-Report
3. Akhmedova, E., Pozdnyakova, I., Misherina, I., Kolosova, N., Pashina, S., & Uvarova, N. (2019, December). Art pedagogical space as an innovative environment for creative development of a child. In International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019) (pp. 254-259). Atlantis Press.
4. Akkaya, G. & Ertekin, P. (2021). A Visual Examination of Literature for Twice-exceptional Individuals: A Bibliometric Study. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (52), 492-517. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.706012.
5. Aladsani, M. (2020). Investigating Teachers’ Perspectives of Gifted Students with Specific Learning Disabilities in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University).
6. Alhumaid, M. M., Brooke, M., & Khoo, S. (2022). Insider Perspectives on Saudi Arabia’s Fakher Disability Sports Programme. Sustainability, 14(17), 10706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710706.
7. Alsamiri, Y. (2019). Twice-exceptional students in Saudi Arabia: A review of the research literature from 1990 to 2018. International Journal of Learning Management Systems, 7(2), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijlms.2019.200140.
8. Alsharif, N., & Alasiri, H. (2022). Teachers’ Perspectives on Obstacles Facing Gifted Students with Learning Disabilities in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(4), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.4.32.
9. Alyami, A. (2009). The integration of art therapy into physical rehabilitation in a Saudi hospital. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 36(5), 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2009.07.001.
10. Arnstein, K.B. (2022). The Intersectionality of Twice-Exceptionality: Historic, Current, and Future Perspectives. In: F. H. Piske, K. H. Collins & K.B. Arnstein (Eds.), Critical Issues in Servicing Twice Exceptional Students. (pp. 3-18). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10378-0_1
11. Azmat, F., Rentschler, R., Lee, B., & Fujimoto, Y. (2023). Understanding social responsibility and relational pressures in nonprofit organisations. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267231183852.
12. Baghestani, A. R., Ahmadi, F., Tanha, A., & Meshkat, M. (2019). Bayesian critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 52(1), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1308227.
13. Barnes, C. (2019). Understanding the social model of disability: Past, present and future. In: N. Watson, A. Roulstone & C. Thomas, Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 14-31). Routledge.
14. Beckmann, E., & Minnaert, A. (2018). Non-cognitive characteristics of gifted students with learning disabilities: An in-depth systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00504.
15. Billups, F. D. (2021). Qualitative data collection tools: Design, development, and applications (pp. 36-87). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878699.
16. Cain, M. K., Kaboski, J. R., & Gilger, J. W. (2019). Profiles and academic trajectories of cognitively gifted children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 23(7), 1663-1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318804019.
17. Carroll, L.S.L. (2018). Practical Interventions to Improve Domain-Specific Social, Emotional, or Academic Outcomes for Twice-Exceptional Individuals (2e). Preprints 2018, 2018120282. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201812.0282.v1.
18. Chung, S., & Son, J. W. (2023). How well do we understand autistic savant artists: A review of various hypotheses and research findings to date. Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.230004.
19. Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (2015). "Theory into Practice: Teaching Talented Visual Art Students in Hong Kong". In H. E. Vidergor & C. R. Harris (Eds.), Applied Practice for Educators of Gifted and Able Learners (pp.429-439). The Brill.
20. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed). Sage publications.
21. Dai, D. Y. (2017). Envisioning a New Foundation for Gifted Education: Evolving Complexity Theory (ECT) of Talent Development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701837.
22. Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2013). Three Paradigms of Gifted Education: In Search of Conceptual Clarity in Research and Practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490020.
23. Dai, D. Y., & Li, X. (2020). Behind an accelerated scientific research career: Dynamic interplay of endogenous and exogenous forces in talent development. Education Sciences, 10(9), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090220
24. Darcy, S., Maxwell, H., Grabowski, S., & Onyx, J. (2019). Artistic Impact: From Casual and Serious Leisure to Professional Career Development in Disability Arts. Leisure Sciences, 44(4), 514–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2019.1613461.
25. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In. N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.) 5th ed, The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp.1-26). SAGE Publications.
26. Edwards, B. M., Smart, E., King, G., Curran, C. J., & Kingsnorth, S. (2018). Performance and visual arts-based programs for children with disabilities: a scoping review focusing on psychosocial outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(4), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1503734.
27. Finley, C. (2013). Access to the visual arts: History and Programming for People with Disabilities. Vanderbilt Kennedy Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities.
28. Foley Nicpon, M., Allmon, A., Sieck, B., & Stinson, R. D. (2011). Empirical Investigation of Twice-Exceptionality: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698621038257.
29. Garrels, V., & Sigstad, H. M. H. (2021). Employment for persons with intellectual disability in the Nordic countries: A scoping review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 34(4), 993-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12880.
30. Gibbs, G. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526441867.
31. Gierczyk, M., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (2021). The Impact of School Environment on Talent Development: A Retrospective View of Gifted British and Polish College Students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 567-592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211034909
32. Goddard, J. (2018). Valuing the place of young people with learning disabilities in the arts. In B. Kelly, B. Byrne (Eds.), Valuing Disabled Children and Young People (pp. 170-187). Routledge.
33. Gupta, N., & Zieske, C. (2024). Arts-based phenomenological research: Theory and praxis. Qualitative Psychology, 11(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000285.
34. Gute, R., G., Gute, D.S., Nakamura, J., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The Early Lives of Highly Creative Persons: The Influence of the Complex Family. In: M., Csikszentmihalyi The Systems Model of Creativity: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. (pp. 293-317). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_18.
35. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications.
36. Knotek, S. E., Foley-Nicpon, M., Kozbelt, A., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Portenga, S., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2020). Gatekeeping in high-performance settings. Review of general psychology, 24(3), 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020905578.
37. Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092.
38. Kousha, K., Stuart, E., Abdoli, M., & Thelwall, M. (2024). How do museums and galleries help academics create societal impact? An analysis of the UK REF2021 impact case studies. Scientometrics, 129(12), 7759-7782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05180-3.
39. Kozbelt, A. (2022). The Future of the Fine Arts. In: Henriksen, D., Mishra, P. (eds) Creative Provocations: Speculations on the Future of Creativity, Technology & Learning. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, (pp. 97-111). vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14549-0_7.
40. Kuo, C. (2022). Expanding the Conception of Giftedness to Talent Development. Gifted Education International, 38(3), 438-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211062298
41. Lovett, B. J., & Sparks, R. L. (2013). The Identification and Performance of Gifted Students with Learning Disability Diagnoses: A Quantitative Synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(4), 304-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411421810.
42. Maddocks, D. L. S. (2020). Cognitive and Achievement Characteristics of Students from a National Sample Identified as Potentially Twice Exceptional (Gifted with a Learning Disability). Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219886668.
43. Magon, R., & Cupchik, G. (2023). Examining the Role of Aesthetic Experiences in Self-Realization and Self-Transcendence: A Thematic Analysis. Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 10(1-2), 68-94. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2023-0006.
44. Miller, S. M. (2020). Disability Art: Potential Intersections in Studio Practice with Artists Labeled/With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Art Therapy, 37(2), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2020.1756136.
45. Mohammed, A. A. (2020). The Effects of Disability Labeling on Teachers’ Referrals of Twice-exceptional Children to Gifted Programs in Saudi Arabia. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado].
46. Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091.
47. National Association for Gifted Children. (2014, July). Arts Education and Gifted and Talented Students (Position Statement). Arlington, VA: Author. from https://nagc.org/page/position-statements.
48. National Association for Gifted Children. (2018, August). Use of the WISC-V for gifted and twice exceptional identification (Position Statement). Arlington, VA: Author. from https://nagc.org/page/position-statements.
49. Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of Purposive Sampling Techniques with Their Examples and Application in Qualitative Research Studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(1), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419.
50. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2018). The Role of the Family in Talent Development. In: Pfeiffer, S. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_9
51. Olszewski‐Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., Davis, L. C., & Worrell, F. C. (2019). Benchmarking psychosocial skills important for talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20318.
52. Paik, S.J., Kunisaki, L.T., Tran, V.Q. and Marshall-Harper, K.R. (2023), "Understanding the talent development of notable artists and scientists of color and women: why contextual factors matter", European Journal of Training and Development, 47 (3/4), 301-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2021-0100.
53. Pennings, M. (2015). Art museums and the global tourist: Experience centers in experiencescapes. Athens Journal of Tourism, 2(4), 209-221.
54. Peters, S. J. (2022). The Challenges of Achieving Equity Within Public School Gifted and Talented Programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
55. Piirto, J. (2022). Talent development in the arts: A unique pathway or branches on a common road? In J. VanTassel-Baska. (Ed.), Talent development in gifted education: Theory, research, and practice, (pp. 195-210). Routledge.
56. Reis, S. M., Baum, S. M., & Burke, E. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976.
57. Sanita, J. K. (2019). The Phenomenon of Artistic Talent in the Dyslexic Brain Visual Arts as an Intervention Strategy for Students with Dyslexia. [Master's Thesis, California State University, Long Beach].
58. Seaman, B. A. (2020). Economic impact of the arts. In R. Towse and T. Navarrete Hernández. (Ed.), Handbook of Cultural Economics, Third Edition (pp. 241-253). Edward Elgar Publishing.
59. Stober, K., & García Iriarte, E. (2022). Intellectual disability, art and identity: a qualitative exploration of the experiences of professional artists with intellectual disabilities. Disability & Society, 38(10), 1871–1894. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2045187.
60. Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056.
61. Subotnik, R. F., Stoeger, H., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2017). Talent development research, policy, and practice in Europe and the United States: Outcomes from a summit of international researchers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 262-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701839.
62. Trail, B. A. (2022). Twice-exceptional gifted children: Understanding, teaching, and counseling gifted students. Routledge.
63. Treffert, D. A., & Rebedew, D. L. (2015). The Savant Syndrome Registry: A Preliminary Report. WMJ: official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin, 114(4), 158–162. https://wmjonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/114/4/158.pdf.
64. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2008). The UN Convention on the rights of persons with Disabilities. New York: UN DESA. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.
65. Visual Arts National Coalition for Core Arts Standards. (2014). National Core Arts Standards. Rights Administered by the State Education Agency Directors of Arts Education. Dover.
66. Wilson, H. E. (2018). Integrating the arts and STEM for gifted learners. Roeper review, 40(2), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1434712.
منشور
2025-02-03
كيفية الاقتباس
فهد علي المعيلي, & د. عبد الحميد عبد الله العرفج. (2025). العوامل المؤثرة على تنمية مواهب الفنانين مزدوجي الاستثنائية النخبة في المملكة العربية السعودية . Journal of Educational and Human Sciences, (42), 286-306. https://doi.org/10.33193/JEAHS.42.2025.590
إصدار
القسم
المقالات
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2025 فهد علي المعيلي , د. عبد الحميد عبد الله العرفج
هذا العمل مرخص حسب الرخصة Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
