فاعلية عناصر التلعيب الرقمي في المنصات التعليمية على تحسين الدافعية لدى طلاب المرحلة المتوسطة
الملخص
لقد أصبحت المنصات التعليمية أحد أساسيات التعلم في وقتنا الراهن وهو ما يفرض على الباحثين ضرورة النظر في آليات تطويرها وتحسينها بحيث تكون قدرة على تعزيز الدافعية لدى الطلاب. ولما كانت عناصر التلعيب الرقمي من بين المتغيرات التصميمة المهمة التي يمكن الاعتماد عليها في تطوير المنصات الرقمية فإن البحث الحالي يحاول اختبار قدرة عناصر التلعيب عبر المنصات التعليمية في تحسين مؤشرات الدافعية لدى طلاب المرحلة المتوسطة. تم استخدام المنهج شبه التجريبي للمقارنة بين المجموعة التجريبية التي استخدمت منصة تعليمية قائمة على عناصر التلعيب، والمجموعة الضابطة التي استخدمت ذات المنصة بدون أي عناصر للتعليب الرقمي. تكونت عينة البحث من (60) طالبًا من طلاب الصف الثالث متوسط تم توزيعهم عشوائيًا على مجموعتي البحث بواقع (30) طالبًا بكل مجموعة. تم تطوير مقياس للدافعية للتعلم عبر المنصات التعليمية، وقد تضمن المقياس ستة محاور أساسية، وهي: (1) الشعور بالمسؤولية، (2) المثابرة، (3) مستوى الطموح، (4) تقدير أهمية الوقت، (5) الاستمتاع بممارسات التعلم، (6) التخطيط للمستقبل ، بإجمالي (36) مفردة. أظهرت النتائج أفضلية المنصات التعليمية القائمة على عناصر التلعيب الرقمي في تنمية الدافعية للتعلم لدى الطلاب. أوصى البحث بضرورة التوسع في تطوير المناهج التعليمية والمنصات الرقمية بحيث يتم توظيف عناصر التلعيب بداخلها لتكون بمثابة أدوات قوية لتحسين الدافعية.
المراجع
2. Al-Nasheri, A. A., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges of Using Micro-learning during the Pandemic of COVID-19 from the Perspectives of Teachers. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(9s), 1195-1208.
3. Alanzi, N. S., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2022a). Investigation The Requirements For Implementing Digital Platforms During Emergencies From The Point Of View Of Faculty Members: Qualitative Research. Journal of Positive School Psychology (JPSP), 9(6), 4910-4920.
4. Alanzi, N. S., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2022b). A Proposed Model for Employing Digital Platforms in Developing the Motivation for Achievement Among Students of Higher Education During Emergencies. Journal of Positive School Psychology (JPSP), 6(9), 4921-4933.
5. Alhalafawy, W. S., Najmi, A. H., Zaki, M. Z. T., & Alharthi, M. A. (2021). Design an Adaptive Mobile Scaffolding System According to Students' Cognitive Style Simplicity vs Complexity for Enhancing Digital Well-Being. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(13).
6. Alhalafawy, W. S., & Tawfiq, M. Z. (2014). The relationship between types of image retrieval and cognitive style in developing visual thinking skills. Life Science Journal, 11(9), 865-879.
7. Alhalafawy, W. S., & Zaki, M. Z. (2019). The Effect of Mobile Digital Content Applications Based on Gamification in the Development of Psychological Well-Being. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 13(08), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i08.10725
8. Alhalafawy, W. S., & Zaki, M. Z. (2022). How has gamification within digital platforms affected self-regulated learning skills during the COVID-19 pandemic? Mixed-methods research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(6), 123-151.
9. Alshammary, F. M., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2022). Sustaining Enhancement of Learning Outcomes across Digital Platforms during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(9), 2279-2301.
10. Alshammary, F. M., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2023). Digital Platforms and the Improvement of Learning Outcomes: Evidence Extracted from Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, 15(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021305
11. Alzahrani, F. K., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2023). Gamification for Learning Sustainability in the Blackboard System: Motivators and Obstacles from Faculty Members’ Perspectives. Sustainability, 15(5), 4613. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3390/su15054613
12. Alzahrani, F. K. J., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2022). Benefits And Challenges Of Using Gamification Across Distance Learning Platforms At Higher Education: A Systematic Review Of Research Studies Published During The COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Positive School Psychology (JPSP), 6(10), 1948-1977.
13. Alzahrani, F. K. J., Alshammary, F. M., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2022). Gamified Platforms: The Impact of Digital Incentives on Engagement in Learning During Covide-19 Pandemic. Cultural Management: Science and Education (CMSE), 7(2), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.30819/cmse.6-2.05
14. Arnab, S., Bhakta, R., Merry, S. K., Smith, M., Star, K., & Duncan, M. (2016). Competition and Collaboration Using a Social and Gamified Online Learning Platform. 10th European Conference on Games Based Learning: ECGBL 2016,
15. Attali, Y., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2015). Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance? Computers & Education, 83, 57-63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.012
16. Baah, C., Govender, I., & Rontala Subramaniam, P. (2023). Exploring the role of gamification in motivating students to learn. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2210045. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2210045
17. Bakhanova, E., Garcia, J. A., Raffe, W. L., & Voinov, A. (2020). Targeting social learning and engagement: What serious games and gamification can offer to participatory modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 134, 104846. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104846
18. Barr, P. (2008). Video game values: Play as human-computer interaction Victoria University of Wellington].
19. Bíró, G. I. (2014). Didactics 2.0: A pedagogical analysis of gamification theory from a comparative perspective with a special view to the components of learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 148-151.
20. Brull, S., & Finlayson, S. (2016). Importance of gamification in increasing learning. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(8), 372-375.
21. Chen, C.-M., Li, M.-C., & Chen, T.-C. (2020). A web-based collaborative reading annotation system with gamification mechanisms to improve reading performance. Computers & Education, 144, 103697. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103697
22. Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75-87.
23. Chow, C. Y., Riantiningtyas, R. R., Kanstrup, M. B., Papavasileiou, M., Liem, G. D., & Olsen, A. (2020). Can games change children’s eating behaviour? A review of gamification and serious games. Food Quality and Preference, 80, 103823. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103823
24. Davison, M., & Baum, W. M. (2006). Do conditional reinforcers count? J Exp Anal Behav, 86(3), 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2006.56-05
25. de-Marcos, L., Garcia-Lopez, E., & Garcia-Cabot, A. (2016). On the effectiveness of game-like and social approaches in learning: Comparing educational gaming, gamification & social networking. Computers & Education, 95, 99-113.
26. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments,
27. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. CHI'11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems,
28. Ding, L. (2019). Applying gamifications to asynchronous online discussions: A mixed methods study. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.022
29. Fernández, R., Gil, I., Palacios, D., & Devece, C. (2011). Technology platforms in distance learning: Functions, characteristics and selection criteria for use in higher education. WMSCI 2011-The 15th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings,
30. Friedrich, J., Becker, M., Kramer, F., Wirth, M., & Schneider, M. (2020). Incentive design and gamification for knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 106, 341-352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.009
31. Gottfried, A. E. (2019a). Academic Intrinsic Motivation: Theory, Assessment, and Longitudinal Research. Advances in Motivation Science, 6, 71.
32. Gottfried, A. E. (2019b). Chapter Three - Academic Intrinsic Motivation: Theory, Assessment, and Longitudinal Research. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in Motivation Science (Vol. 6, pp. 71-109). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2018.11.001
33. Groening, C., & Binnewies, C. (2019). “Achievement unlocked!” - The impact of digital achievements as a gamification element on motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 151-166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.026
34. Groh, F. (2012). Gamification: State of the art definition and utilization. Institute of Media Informatics Ulm University, 39.
35. Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., Roy, A., & Litalien, D. (2010). Academic self-concept, autonomous academic motivation, and academic achievement: Mediating and additive effects. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 644-653.
36. Hamari, J. (2017). Do badges increase user activity? A field experiment on the effects of gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 469-478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.036
37. Hammedi, W., Leclercq, T., Poncin, I., & Alkire, L. (2021). Uncovering the dark side of gamification at work: Impacts on engagement and well-being. Journal of Business Research, 122, 256-269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.032
38. Hassan, L., Dias, A., & Hamari, J. (2019). How motivational feedback increases user’s benefits and continued use: A study on gamification, quantified-self and social networking. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 151-162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.004
39. Hew, K. F., Huang, B., Chu, K. W. S., & Chiu, D. K. (2016). Engaging Asian students through game mechanics: Findings from two experiment studies. Computers & Education, 92, 221-236.
40. Höllig, C. E., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2020). Individualizing gamified systems: The role of trait competitiveness and leaderboard design. Journal of Business Research, 106, 288-303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.046
41. [Record #2363 is using a reference type undefined in this output style.]
42. Jeno, L. M., Grytnes, J.-A., & Vandvik, V. (2017). The effect of a mobile-application tool on biology students' motivation and achievement in species identification: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Computers & Education, 107, 1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.011
43. Józsa, K., & Barrett, K. C. (2018). Affective and social mastery motivation in preschool as predictors of early school success: A longitudinal study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 45, 81-92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.05.007
44. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.
45. Kayımbaşıoğlu, D., Oktekin, B., & Hacı, H. (2016). Integration of Gamification Technology in Education. Procedia Computer Science, 102, 668-676.
46. Kim, D., Lee, Y., Leite, W. L., & Huggins-Manley, A. C. (2020). Exploring student and teacher usage patterns associated with student attrition in an open educational resource-supported online learning platform. Computers & Education, 156, 103961. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103961
47. Kim, Y.-e., Brady, A. C., & Wolters, C. A. (2018). Development and validation of the brief regulation of motivation scale. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 259-265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.12.010
48. Lamal, P. (2010). A Primer About B.F. Skinner and the Origins of Behavior Analysis: Burrhus F. Skinner: The Shaping of Behaviour. By Frederick Toates. Behavior and Social Issues, 19(1), 179-180. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3224
49. Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., & Callan, R. C. (2017). Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 508-515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.008
50. Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., Callan, R. C., & Armstrong, M. B. (2015). Psychological Theory and the Gamification of Learning. In T. Reiners & L. C. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in Education and Business (pp. 165-186). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_9
51. Lazarides, R., Dietrich, J., & Taskinen, P. H. (2019). Stability and change in students' motivational profiles in mathematics classrooms: The role of perceived teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 164-175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.016
52. Martin, A. J. (2001). The Student Motivation Scale: A tool for measuring and enhancing motivation. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 11, 1-20.
53. Naidoo, J. (2020). Postgraduate mathematics education students’ experiences of using digital platforms for learning within the COVID-19 pandemic era. Pythagoras, 41(1), 11.
54. Najmi, A. H., Alhalafawy, W. S., & Zaki, M. Z. T. (2023). Developing a Sustainable Environment Based on Augmented Reality to Educate Adolescents about the Dangers of Electronic Gaming Addiction. Sustainability, 15(4), 3185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043185
55. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. Handbook of positive psychology, 195-206.
56. Otani, M. (2019). Relationships between parental involvement and adolescents’ academic achievement and aspiration. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.005
57. Pal, D., & Vanijja, V. (2020). Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105535
58. Perryer, C., Celestine, N. A., Scott-Ladd, B., & Leighton, C. (2016). Enhancing workplace motivation through gamification: Transferrable lessons from pedagogy. The International Journal of Management Education, 14(3), 327-335.
59. Richter, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2015). Studying gamification: the effect of rewards and incentives on motivation. In Gamification in education and business (pp. 21-46). Springer.
60. Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017a). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69(Supplement C), 371-380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
61. Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017b). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
62. Sanchez, D. R., Langer, M., & Kaur, R. (2020). Gamification in the classroom: Examining the impact of gamified quizzes on student learning. Computers & Education, 144, 103666. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103666
63. Schreglmann, S. (2018). Developing Academic Motivation Scale for Learning Information Technology (AMSLIT): A Study of Validity and Reliability. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 145-153.
64. Senkbeil, M. (2018). Development and validation of the ICT motivation scale for young adolescents. Results of the international school assessment study ICILS 2013 in Germany. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 167-176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.007
65. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of educational psychology, 100(4), 765-781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
66. Suh, A., Wagner, C., & Liu, L. (2015). The effects of game dynamics on user engagement in gamified systems. System Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on,
67. Turel, Y. K., & Ozer Sanal, S. (2018). The effects of an ARCS based e-book on student's achievement, motivation and anxiety. Computers & Education, 127, 130-140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.006
68. Urh, M., Vukovic, G., Jereb, E., & Pintar, R. (2015). The Model for Introduction of Gamification into E-learning in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(Supplement C), 388-397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.154
69. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
70. van Roy, R., & Zaman, B. (2019). Unravelling the ambivalent motivational power of gamification: A basic psychological needs perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 38-50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.04.009
71. Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2005). Low Examinee Effort in Low-Stakes Assessment: Problems and Potential Solutions. Educational Assessment, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1
72. Wu, Z. (2019). Academic Motivation, Engagement, and Achievement Among College Students. College Student Journal, 53(1), 99-112.
73. Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H., & Chu, S. K. W. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145, 103729. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729
74. Zainuddin, Z., Wah Chu, S. K., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
75. Zeidan, A. A., Alhalafawy, W. S., & Tawfiq, M. Z. (2017). The Effect of (Macro/Micro) Wiki Content Organization on Developing Metacognition Skills. Life Science Journal, 14(12).
76. Zeidan, A. A., Alhalafawy, W. S., Tawfiq, M. Z., & Abdelhameed, W. R. (2015). The effectiveness of some e-blogging patterns on developing the informational awareness for the educational technology innovations and the King Abdul-Aziz University postgraduate students' attitudes towards it. Life Science Journal, 12(12).
77. Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
